My old friend Glenn Peoples reviewed some of my recent writing on The connection between the Resurrection of Daniel 12 and the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares in Mat 13 and insisted that the whole idea was of no merit, much to my chagrin.
I have no idea why it is so bizarre to suggest that the rising of the wheat and the tares is equal to the rising of the wise and the rest in Dan 12:2, especially given that Jesus quotes Dan 12:3 to explain the parable!
So, without further ado, read my new paper:
The Resurrection of the Just and the Unjust In the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares
and decide for yourself.
Tuesday, January 30, 2018
In 2017 I did a lot of study on divorce and remarriage. I was not satisfied that I had properly examined the arguments in favour of divorce and remarriage. My analysis of the Sermon on the Mount suggested the Lord was so opposed to divorce and remarriage that even the innocent wife divorced by the treacherous husband, on remarriage she was condemned as an adulteress. But I wasn't really sure I had fully examined the arguments proffered for permitting divorce and remarriage in some circumstances.
I had an old friend, Renee, invite me to celebrate her remarriage, so told her I wasn't sure I could attend, and asked what happened to her earlier husband Hans. She said he was unfaithful and so she justified her divorce on this basis and appealed to David Instone-Brewer's teaching to justify her actions.
So I did a full study on David Instone-Brewer's arguments and discovered an excellent scholar doing good work on the topic and using that material to draw conclusions against the evidence he himself had uncovered and documented. My critique therefore primarily draws on his own material as well as seeking to work through the biblical texts.
I have updated the paper in Jan 2018.
See here for the critique (Updated version Jan 2018).